Fukushima Lesson on What Could Be Nuclear Power Crisis

Written by Holly Robin. Posted in World

Tagged: , , , , ,

Published on May 10, 2011 with 1 Comment

Nuclear Power is back in the news today as Japan’s Prime minister Nato Kan, announces that Japan will be abandoning the 2010 plans to build 14 new nuclear reactors by 2030.   In light of the Fukushima Daiichi plant disaster, Kan acknowledges that Japan needs to “start from scratch” when it comes to creating a new energy policy.

Perhaps other countries such as Germany, Russia and even here in the United States will follow the lead of Prime Minister Kan and Japan when it comes to the use of nuclear power as an energy source.  Before the quake Japan was planning on increasing the share of nuclear power in its electricity supply from 30% up to 50% by adding 14 new nuclear reactors to the 54 already in operation.

While Japan makes crucial steps to move away from relying on nuclear power, Russia completes a vital pre-launch test at the Bushehr nuclear power plant in Iran.

Construction on the nuclear power plant in the Islamic republic began in 1970 with the help of Germany’s Siemens Company and has been strongly opposed by Israel. Israeli has feared that the construction and recent completion of the power plant forms a part of Iran’s suspected nuclear weapons development program.  Iran dismissed these charges as Russia’s involvement received the informal blessing of the United States.

Following the natural disaster in Japan that led to the nuclear crisis in Fukushima, President Barack Obama ordered all nuclear power plants located near seismic zones to be evaluated.  One of the most feared nuclear meltdowns is that of the Indian Point site located in Buchanon, N.Y.  After the 1979 Three Mile Island incident precautionary measures were taken to prepare Indian Point operators for a similar disaster.

Now once again all eyes are on Entergy’s Indian Point Energy Center as Gregory B. Jaczko, Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, is scheduled to tour the site today. Accompanying NRC on the visit to the plant is two of Indian Point’s biggest critics, Representatives Nita Lowey and Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.)

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission visit comes ahead of its 60-day briefing on the review of the Fukushima disaster that will inform us here in the United States about lessons that can be learned from the crisis in Japan.

A plan to discuss the contingency plans in the event of an Indian Point nuclear crisis are scheduled to take place at Stony Point this upcoming Thursday, May 12, 2011 hosted by New York State Senators, David Carlucci (D), along with Greg Ball (R) and George Maziarz (R).

“The Indian Point nuclear power plant, which sits within two miles of two intersecting fault lines has the highest risk of an earthquake causing its reactors core damage in the United States,” Carlucci said in a statement.

“To ensure the safety of the 20 million people who live within the 50-mile peak injury zone, Senator Maziarz, Senator Ball and I will be holding a hearing focused on detailing plans and precautions in the event of a natural disaster.”

Didn't find what you were looking for? Search Google here

1 Comment

There are currently 1 Comment on Fukushima Lesson on What Could Be Nuclear Power Crisis. Perhaps you would like to add one of your own?

  1. Here is what is going to derail that dinosaur.

    Please take 15 min and explore the link provided

    Rossi has given three demonstrations so far including with professors from Bologna University and the Swedish skeptics society and the Chairman of the Swedish Physics Union. This is a link to the LENR site where detailed information about cold fusion efforts is available. http://www.lenr-canr.org/News... The Naval Research lab has been working on this with positive results for over 10 years. Yet the major scientific magazines refuse to touch this issue since it was purportedly discredited by some researchers and an institution that stood to lose 10s of millions in funding per year and numerous PHD candidates and hundreds of grad students who were working on the government funded hot fusion reactor. This funded hot fusion system has never produced surplus energy after billions have been spent and years of research.

    Rossi has announced a 1MW Cold Fusion facility to be opened in Greece this Oct. Yet top line periodicals have yet to publish even one article. This will change the economics of the world lifting many people out of poverty and it will also threaten many vested interests.

    FROM LENR-News
    Rossi 6-hour demonstration convinces Swedish experts
    April 2011
    On March 29, 2011, a test of a smaller Rossi device was performed. It was attended by two new observers: Hanno Essén, associate professor of theoretical physics and chairman of the Swedish Skeptics Society, and Sven Kullander, chairman of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences’ Energy Committee. They agree with other independent observers that the device must be producing a nuclear reaction. See NyTeknik: Swedish physicists on the E-cat: “It’s a nuclear reaction.”
    This test employed a new, smaller device with a 50 cm3 cell. It produced ~4.4 kW for 6 hours, or 25 kWh (90 MJ).
    Essén and Kullander wrote a report, also in NyTeknik, Experimental test of a mini-Rossi device at the Leonardocorp, Bologna 29 March 2011. Focardi gave a revealing radio interview. Here is an English translation.
    NyTeknik has published a number of articles about Rossi. They are all listed here. The New Energy Times is keeping a close watch on news articles about Rossi. They have a list of articles here.

    Plans to begin commercial cold fusion reactor production this year
    March 2011
    A company has been formed in Athens, Greece, Defkalion Green Technologies S. A., for the purpose of manufacturing and selling Andrea Rossi Energy Catalyzer cold fusion reactors. According to the Greek newspaper “Investor’s World” and other sources, the company is capitalized at €200 million, which includes €100 million to be paid in as royalties, presumably to Rossi. The Greek press says the company plans to manufacture 300,000 machines a year for the Greek and Balkan market. The company website says it has exclusive rights to sell the machines everywhere except the Americas.
    http://www.lenr-canr.org/News...

    Rossi has announced that he is fabricating a 1 MW reactor to produce hot water (not steam or electricity), scheduled for October 2011. He is building the machine in Florida before shipping it to the Defkalion factory. It will consist of 100 small devices similar to the one demonstrated at U. Bologna.
    We have uploaded a new paper from Scott Chubb describing the Rossi device and recent events about it.

    Rossi 18-hour demonstration
    February 2011, updated March 2011
    On February 10 and 11, 2011, Levi et al. (U. Bologna) performed another test of the Rossi device. Compared to the January 14 test, they used a much higher flow rate, to keep the cooling water from vaporizing. This is partly to recover more heat, and partly because Celani and others criticized phase-change calorimetry as too complicated. There were concerns about the enthalpy of wet steam versus dry steam, and the use of a relative humidity meter to determine how dry the steam was. A source close to the test gave Jed Rothwell the following figures. These are approximations:
    Duration of test: 18 hours
    Flow rate: 3,000 L/h = ~833 ml/s.
    Cooling water input temperature: 15°C
    Cooling water output temperature: ~20°C
    Input power from control electronics: variable, average 80 W, closer to 20 W for 6 hours
    The temperature difference of 5°C * 833 ml = 4,165 calories/second = 17,493 W. Observers estimated average power as 16 kW. A 5°C temperature difference can easily be measured with confidence.
    3,000 L/h is 793 gallons/h, which is the output of a medium-sized $120 ornamental pond pump.
    The control electronics input of ~80 W is in line with what was reported for tests before Jan. 14. Input power was high on that day because there was a problem with cracked welding, according to the Levi report.
    18 hours * 16 kW = 288 kWh = 1,037 MJ. That is the amount of energy in 26 kg of gasoline (7.9 gallons). Given the size and weight of the device, this rules out a chemical source of energy.
    NyTeknik published a fascinating description of the latest experiment (in English). This includes new details, such as the fact that the power briefly peaked at 130 kW. NyTeknik also published an interview with two outside experts about the demonstration: Prof. Emeritus at Uppsala University Sven Kullander, chairman of the National Academy of Sciences Energy Committee, and Hanno Essén, associate professor of theoretical physics, Swedish Royal Institute of Technology. Two versions are available, in English and Swedish.
    On March 3, Rossi conducted an informative on-line chat with NyTeknik readers.
    Rossi and U. Bologna have announced that tests on the device will continue for a year.

Leave a Comment

Switch to our mobile site